Michael Backman
The Age , 15/11/06
MALAYSIA'S
been at it again, arguing about what proportion of the economy each of
its two main races — the Malays and the Chinese — owns. It's an
argument that's been running for 40 years. That wealth and race are not
synonymous is important for national cohesion, but really it's time
Malaysia grew up.
It's a tough
world out there and there can be little sympathy for a country that
prefers to argue about how to divide wealth rather than get on with the
job of creating it.
The long-held aim is for 30 per cent of
corporate equity to be in Malay hands, but the figure that the
Government uses to justify handing over huge swathes of public
companies to Malays but not to other races is absurd. It bases its
figure on equity valued, not at market value, but at par value.
Many
shares have a par value of say $1 but a market value of $12. And so the
Government figure (18.9 per cent is the most recent figure) is a gross
underestimate. Last month a paper by a researcher at a local think-tank
came up with a figure of 45 per cent based on actual stock prices. All
hell broke loose. The paper was withdrawn and the researcher resigned
in protest. Part of the problem is that he is Chinese.
"Malaysia
boleh!" is Malaysia's national catch cry. It translates to "Malaysia
can!" and Malaysia certainly can. Few countries are as good at wasting
money. It is richly endowed with natural resources and the national
obsession seems to be to extract these, sell them off and then
collectively spray the proceeds up against the wall.
This all happens in the context of Malaysia's grossly inflated sense of its place in the world.
Most
Malaysians are convinced that the eyes of the world are on their
country and that their leaders are world figures. This is thanks to
Malaysia's tame media and the bravado of former prime minister Mahathir
Mohamad. The truth is, few people on the streets of London or New York
could point to Malaysia on a map much less name its prime minister or
capital city.
As if to make this point, a recent episode of The
Simpsons features a newsreader trying to announce that a tidal wave had
hit some place called Kuala Lumpur. He couldn't pronounce the city's
name and so made up one, as if no-one cared anyway. But the joke was on
the script writers — Kuala Lumpur is inland.
Petronas, the
national oil company is well run, particularly when compared to the
disaster that passes for a national oil company in neighbouring
Indonesia. But in some respects, this is Malaysia's problem. The very
success of Petronas means that it is used to underwrite all manner of
excess.
The KLCC development in central Kuala Lumpur is an
example. It includes the Twin Towers, the tallest buildings in the
world when they were built, which was their point.
It certainly wasn't that there was an office shortage in Kuala Lumpur — there wasn't.
Malaysians
are very proud of these towers. Goodness knows why. They had little to
do with them. The money for them came out of the ground and the
engineering was contracted out to South Korean companies.
They don't even run the shopping centre that's beneath them. That's handled by Australia's Westfield.
Next
year, a Malaysian astronaut will go into space aboard a Russian rocket
— the first Malay in space. And the cost? $RM95 million ($A34.3
million), to be footed by Malaysian taxpayers. The Science and
Technology Minister has said that a moon landing in 2020 is the next
target, aboard a US flight. There's no indication of what the Americans
will charge for this, assuming there's even a chance that they will
consider it. But what is Malaysia getting by using the space programs
of others as a taxi service? There are no obvious technical benefits,
but no doubt Malaysians will be told once again, that they are "boleh".
The trouble is, they're not. It's not their space program.
Back
in July, the Government announced that it would spend $RM490 million on
a sports complex near the London Olympics site so that Malaysian
athletes can train there and "get used to cold weather".
But the summer Olympics are held in the summer.
So
what is the complex's real purpose? The dozens of goodwill missions by
ministers and bureaucrats to London to check on the centre's
construction and then on the athletes while they train might provide a
clue.
Bank bale outs, a formula one racing track, an entire new
capital city — Petronas has paid for them all. It's been an orgy of
nonsense that Malaysia can ill afford.
Why? Because Malaysia's
oil will run out in about 19 years. As it is, Malaysia will become a
net oil importer in 2011 — that's just five years away.
So it's in this context that the latest debate about race and wealth is so sad.
It
is time to move on, time to prepare the economy for life after oil.
But, like Nero fiddling while Rome burned, the Malaysian Government is
more interested in stunts like sending a Malaysian into space when
Malaysia's inadequate schools could have done with the cash, and
arguing about wealth distribution using transparently ridiculous
statistics.
That's not Malaysia "boleh", that's Malaysia "bodoh" (stupid).
ahh.. such is not the normal feedback you get about Malaysia nowadays,
at least not in our local media. the Abdullah administration would've
been severely undermined if we have our media spotting these kind of
opinions. I am a bit embarassed that once I used to look up in awe at
our very own Petronas Twin Towers, but Mr. Backman here puts forth some
very valid points, like how this tasteless squandered funds could've
served to make the lives of many Malaysians much better off, compared
to just getting a very expensive bit of decors for the capital city
skyline to make it look more pleasing in the eyes of Malaysians in the
vicinity.
Perhaps one of the things Mr. Backman hasn't giving full credit to is
the issue of politics. Political arguments are sadly, not confined to
deviding the economic pie amongst the races. Even within the largest
component party in the ruling coalition, UMNO, the political dissention
is rampant. And the saddest part is that most if not all of this
political hoohah have little or nothing to do with the economy.
Malaysian politicians are obviously more concerned with their own
personal quarrels and grudges with each other. But then again, I dare
not say that this is not true of most politicians around the world. But
man! At least have some concern towards the economy and where the
country is heading while you fight it out amongst yourselves.
Sometimes.. sometimes i think.. the only politician that I ever hear
talking about the economy. 81 years old, and the ex-premier still has
more sense than most of our 'wise' leaders in the current
administration.
The political milieu is Malaysia is an embarassment(
enjoy this).
ALL, i say ALL of them lack maturity. But then again, that's why
we are termed a developing country. Compared to some developing
countries, I must admit that we have must to be thankful for, but to
traverse the gap of developing and developed country status, Malaysians
still have a long long long way to go. Perhaps it's time we realised
that the last lap to Vision 2020 is not just about industrialization,
instead, it's also about creating a political and business milieu that
can sustain our endeavors to become a developed state. It is unhealthy
to be ONLY comparing one's performance with ppl who are doing worse off
than yourself. Look upwards Malaysia, and see how far you are behind
and not at how far you are ahead.