The Revelations
var sc_project=719670; var sc_invisible=1; var sc_partition=6; var sc_security="1d9a928e";

Blog EntryMalaysia Boleh!Nov 18, '06 3:50 AM
for everyone
Michael Backman
The Age , 15/11/06

MALAYSIA'S been at it again, arguing about what proportion of the economy each of its two main races — the Malays and the Chinese — owns. It's an argument that's been running for 40 years. That wealth and race are not synonymous is important for national cohesion, but really it's time Malaysia grew up.


It's a tough world out there and there can be little sympathy for a country that prefers to argue about how to divide wealth rather than get on with the job of creating it.

The long-held aim is for 30 per cent of corporate equity to be in Malay hands, but the figure that the Government uses to justify handing over huge swathes of public companies to Malays but not to other races is absurd. It bases its figure on equity valued, not at market value, but at par value.

Many shares have a par value of say $1 but a market value of $12. And so the Government figure (18.9 per cent is the most recent figure) is a gross underestimate. Last month a paper by a researcher at a local think-tank came up with a figure of 45 per cent based on actual stock prices. All hell broke loose. The paper was withdrawn and the researcher resigned in protest. Part of the problem is that he is Chinese.

"Malaysia boleh!" is Malaysia's national catch cry. It translates to "Malaysia can!" and Malaysia certainly can. Few countries are as good at wasting money. It is richly endowed with natural resources and the national obsession seems to be to extract these, sell them off and then collectively spray the proceeds up against the wall.

This all happens in the context of Malaysia's grossly inflated sense of its place in the world.

Most Malaysians are convinced that the eyes of the world are on their country and that their leaders are world figures. This is thanks to Malaysia's tame media and the bravado of former prime minister Mahathir Mohamad. The truth is, few people on the streets of London or New York could point to Malaysia on a map much less name its prime minister or capital city.

As if to make this point, a recent episode of The Simpsons features a newsreader trying to announce that a tidal wave had hit some place called Kuala Lumpur. He couldn't pronounce the city's name and so made up one, as if no-one cared anyway. But the joke was on the script writers — Kuala Lumpur is inland.

Petronas, the national oil company is well run, particularly when compared to the disaster that passes for a national oil company in neighbouring Indonesia. But in some respects, this is Malaysia's problem. The very success of Petronas means that it is used to underwrite all manner of excess.

The KLCC development in central Kuala Lumpur is an example. It includes the Twin Towers, the tallest buildings in the world when they were built, which was their point.

It certainly wasn't that there was an office shortage in Kuala Lumpur — there wasn't.

Malaysians are very proud of these towers. Goodness knows why. They had little to do with them. The money for them came out of the ground and the engineering was contracted out to South Korean companies.

They don't even run the shopping centre that's beneath them. That's handled by Australia's Westfield.

Next year, a Malaysian astronaut will go into space aboard a Russian rocket — the first Malay in space. And the cost? $RM95 million ($A34.3 million), to be footed by Malaysian taxpayers. The Science and Technology Minister has said that a moon landing in 2020 is the next target, aboard a US flight. There's no indication of what the Americans will charge for this, assuming there's even a chance that they will consider it. But what is Malaysia getting by using the space programs of others as a taxi service? There are no obvious technical benefits, but no doubt Malaysians will be told once again, that they are "boleh". The trouble is, they're not. It's not their space program.

Back in July, the Government announced that it would spend $RM490 million on a sports complex near the London Olympics site so that Malaysian athletes can train there and "get used to cold weather".

But the summer Olympics are held in the summer.

So what is the complex's real purpose? The dozens of goodwill missions by ministers and bureaucrats to London to check on the centre's construction and then on the athletes while they train might provide a clue.

Bank bale outs, a formula one racing track, an entire new capital city — Petronas has paid for them all. It's been an orgy of nonsense that Malaysia can ill afford.

Why? Because Malaysia's oil will run out in about 19 years. As it is, Malaysia will become a net oil importer in 2011 — that's just five years away.

So it's in this context that the latest debate about race and wealth is so sad.

It is time to move on, time to prepare the economy for life after oil. But, like Nero fiddling while Rome burned, the Malaysian Government is more interested in stunts like sending a Malaysian into space when Malaysia's inadequate schools could have done with the cash, and arguing about wealth distribution using transparently ridiculous statistics.

That's not Malaysia "boleh", that's Malaysia "bodoh" (stupid).

ahh.. such is not the normal feedback you get about Malaysia nowadays, at least not in our local media. the Abdullah administration would've been severely undermined if we have our media spotting these kind of opinions. I am a bit embarassed that once I used to look up in awe at our very own Petronas Twin Towers, but Mr. Backman here puts forth some very valid points, like how this tasteless squandered funds could've served to make the lives of many Malaysians much better off, compared to just getting a very expensive bit of decors for the capital city skyline to make it look more pleasing in the eyes of Malaysians in the vicinity.

Perhaps one of the things Mr. Backman hasn't giving full credit to is the issue of politics. Political arguments are sadly, not confined to deviding the economic pie amongst the races. Even within the largest component party in the ruling coalition, UMNO, the political dissention is rampant. And the saddest part is that most if not all of this political hoohah have little or nothing to do with the economy. Malaysian politicians are obviously more concerned with their own personal quarrels and grudges with each other. But then again, I dare not say that this is not true of most politicians around the world. But man! At least have some concern towards the economy and where the country is heading while you fight it out amongst yourselves. Sometimes.. sometimes i think.. the only politician that I ever hear talking about the economy. 81 years old, and the ex-premier still has more sense than most of our 'wise' leaders in the current administration.

The political milieu is Malaysia is an embarassment(enjoy this). ALL, i say ALL of them lack  maturity. But then again, that's why we are termed a developing country. Compared to some developing countries, I must admit that we have must to be thankful for, but to traverse the gap of developing and developed country status, Malaysians still have a long long long way to go. Perhaps it's time we realised that the last lap to Vision 2020 is not just about industrialization, instead, it's also about creating a political and business milieu that can sustain our endeavors to become a developed state. It is unhealthy to be ONLY comparing one's performance with ppl who are doing worse off than yourself. Look upwards Malaysia, and see how far you are behind and not at how far you are ahead.

advcongroup wrote on Nov 21, '06
Everyone is raving about this... What to do?
eunicetan wrote on Nov 23, '06
I heard of that post but I'm not too sure where. he did get his point across. Clearly.
10joules wrote on Nov 24, '06
hehe. I guess there's nothing much we, with our current status in society can do about it. Lets just wait till our oil reserves run out and see what happens next. All the government needs is some good ol' dire-situation to spur it into action ;)
Add a Comment
   
© 2008 Multiply, Inc.    About · Blog · Terms · Privacy · Corp Info · Contact Us · Help